For the debate below.

No WMD’s, huh? Stand by!


(Click to enlarge)


(Click to enlarge)


(Click to enlarge)

The Editor-in-Chief, Brett Reed, is currently on vacation (in AZ) and will be back in a week or so...there will be no posts or comments in that time (unless I change my mind)!!! Have a good week and keep warm.

So would you buy it...

or is it dishonest???

The BEST debate moment ever...(here)

Two questions...

(Number 1) Who do you think won this part of this debate?
(Number 2) What's your stance on the “War in Iraq?"

For those of you who THINK you know who you like for the presidency of our great land, please post it to comments.

(“our great land”= United States of America)

Ok good, now take these tests-

Test 1
Test 2

Great, now record the results, and post the them to comments, along with your “comments”

For the love of money is the root of all evil...

Ok, so here it goes...the debate/argument last Thursday night, on money, or rather the USD (United States Dollar) ...yes very interesting. Several of you (everyone but me) said, in effect, that the dollar is worth nothing, but its weight in paper. Because it has been taken off the “Gold Standard” (correct me if I'm wrong). As my usual custom, I took the opposite position, that being, the dollar (like any other physical thing) is ONLY worth what you can buy/trade with it. Thats how the analogy of the cup came about. I said that if you won't sell me the cup for a dollar (or some amount of them) then it (the dollar) is worth nothing, even if backed by the“Gold Standard”. BUT if you sell the cup to me for a dollar then it becomes worth something!

My question to you is, how then can you say that the dollar it worth nothing?

Sorry I have to put this in, for those of you who like to mess with “hypothetically” or “possibly”, we are talking about now, not in a hundred years when you can't buy a cup with a dollar (possibly).

BTW the full Bible verse is 1 Timothy 6:10.

"The choice is yours"

The scenario...

Rudolph Giuliani and Hillery Clinton are the candidates for the two major political parties in the USA (Republican and Democratic) in the 2008 election. They are ahead in the polls...for what its worth. Both of the said candidates support abortion, Hill all the way, and Rudy says he's “against it personally”, but is for “womans choice”. Shawn Hannity and Dr. James Dobson had a debate on the issue here (middle of the page under "Dr. James Dobson") and the OP-ED by Dr. Dobson (in the New York Times) is viewable here

The question is...quoting from the OP-ED...

“If neither of the two major political parties nominates an individual who pledges himself or herself to the sanctity of human life, we will join others in voting for a minor-party candidate. Those agreeing with the proposition were invited to stand”.

AFTER listening to the debate and reading the OP-ED, would you have stood (and why)?

BTW this debate MIGHT have a large impact on who I vote for in 08